Software companies which have been involved in a process improvement programme according to ISO/IEC are showing an increasing interest in the . INTERNATIONAL. STANDARD. ISO/IEC. Second edition. Information ISO’s member body in the country of the requester. ISO copyright. INTERNATIONAL. STANDARD. ISO/IEC. Second edition ISO/IEC exemplar software life cycle Process Assessment.
|Published (Last):||23 April 2007|
|PDF File Size:||1.87 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||13.25 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
There exist several assessment tools. The international standard defines nine process attributes:. This section’s factual accuracy may be compromised due to out-of-date information.
Safety extension van Loon, 51504-5. This was proposed from Japan when the TRs were published at The organization can determine a target capability for suppliers, based on the organization’s needs, and then assess suppliers against a set of target process profiles that specify this target capability.
An organization considering outsourcing software development needs to lso a good understanding of the capability of potential suppliers to 1504-5.
This has been for several reasons:. Views Read Edit View history. The assessor assesses this data using his expert judgment against a process’s base practices and the capability dimension’s generic practices in the process rating step.
An assessor can collect data on a process by various means, including interviews with persons performing the process, collecting documents and quality records, and collecting statistical process data.
Assessors write down the assessment results and notes supporting the assessment judgment. The issued standard now specifies the measurement framework and can use different process reference models. The process assessment model PAM is the detailed model used for an actual assessment. In addition there are methods available that adapt its use to various uso.
For a successful assessment, the assessor must have a suitable level of the relevant skills and experience.
1504-5 The capability of processes is measured using process attributes. SPICE is still used for the user group of the standard, and the title for the annual conference. Data modeling Enterprise architecture Functional specification Modeling language Orthogonality Programming paradigm Software Software archaeology Software architecture Software configuration management Software development methodology Software development process Software quality Software quality assurance Software verification and validation Structured analysis.
Computer science Computer engineering Project management Risk management Systems engineering. The assessor validates this isk to ensure it is accurate and completely covers the assessment scope.
155504-5 reference model defines a process dimension and a capability dimension. The actual method is not specified in the standard although the standard places requirements on the method, method developers and assessors using the method.
ISO standards by standard number. This is an elaboration of the process reference model PRM provided by the process lifecycle standards. Target process profiles are particularly important in contexts where the organization for example, a government department is required to accept the cheapest qualifying vendor. It specifies requirements for improvement programmes and provides guidance on planning and executing improvements, including a description of an eight step improvement programme. ISO provides a standard for assessing the organization’s capacity to deliver at each of these stages.
Please update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Retrieved from ” https: Computer programming Requirements engineering Software deployment Software design Software maintenance Software testing Systems analysis Formal methods.
ISO/IEC – Wikipedia
One of the requirements is to use a conformant assessment method for the assessment process. The simplest comprise paper-based tools.
The process rating is then presented as a preliminary finding to the sponsor and preferably also to the persons assessed to ensure that they agree that the assessment is accurate. 51504-5 on extending the value of capability determination includes a method called Practical Process Profiles – which uses risk as the determining factor in setting target process profiles.
The specific problem is: In a few cases, there may be feedback requiring further assessment before a final process rating is made. In general, they are laid out to incorporate the assessment model indicators, including the base practice indicators and generic practice indicators.
The 7th part is currently in an advanced Final Draft Standard form  and work has started on part 8. Articles needing cleanup from January All pages needing cleanup Cleanup tagged articles with a reason field from January Wikipedia pages needing cleanup from January Articles with obsolete information from October All Wikipedia articles in need of updating All articles with unsourced statements Articles with unsourced statements from May The list of processes covered grew to cover six business areas: List of International Electrotechnical Commission standards.
There are a limited number of computer based tools that present the indicators and allow users to enter the assessment judgment and notes in formatted screens, as well as automate the collated assessment result i.
This page was last edited on 12 Juneat The first versions of the standard focused exclusively on software development processes. This was expanded to cover all related processes in a software business, for example project managementconfiguration managementquality assuranceand so on. This article may require cleanup to meet Wikipedia’s quality standards. The rating is based upon evidence collected against the practice indicators, which demonstrate fulfillment of the process attribute.
The process assessment model in part 6 is based on the process reference model for systems: